6 Apr
2019
6 Apr
'19
5:32 p.m.
On 4/6/19 9:46 AM, John Maddock via Boost wrote:
One thing we could look at for future releases would be to provide differently-named binaries for /Qspectre. Anyone else have thoughts on that?
Hmmm - I question I'm too lazy to investigate so I'll just ask you. Does boost build not provide the option of specifying that the invocation specify the name of the binaries or perhaps some root? Would this not get boost off the hook for addressing special requirements like this? Robert Ramey