Niall Douglas wrote:
... I'd be interested on whether you'd prefer one of these two options:
1. Cronjob generated boostorg/outcome repo from ned14/outcome repo - Licence only BSL - No git submodules - No cmake, just bjam - No file clutter in root of repo as at present, or files unrelated to absolute minimum necessary for Boost
2. Same physical repo as standalone Outcome - Dual licensed - git submodules, but don't need to be checked out - cmake + bjam - Inevitable file clutter as so much tooling insists on files in specific locations
I think I favor option 1 from those two. It probably would be even nicer if you could make boostorg/outcome as described in (1) the primary and git submodule it into the standalone ned14/outcome, but (1) looks good enough.