10 Oct
2013
10 Oct
'13
8:21 a.m.
On 10/10/2013 07:48 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
Stephen Kelly
writes: I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some final decision been made about this? What is the question behind the question? Once the decision is taken, I can get rid of some workarounds in the Boost
On 10/09/2013 12:39 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote: libs I maintain.
Indeed. I already have patches ready to push which remove the use of the macro throughout boost. Thanks, Steve.