12 Oct
2013
12 Oct
'13
1:16 p.m.
On 10/10/2013 11:52 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
But you wouldn't want to go back and make adjustments in the current code just to make it non-functional with older compilers, would you? What is the return on THAT investment. Cleaner, more readable code (hey, I won't be around forever :-)
Exactly. Robert, we've been around this roundabout before. Please don't take us around it again. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/244216/focus=244218 * Making the code look more like normal c++ (eg revisions 85957 and 85958), which makes reading/contributing easier. It is easier to reason about modern code than code which is designed to accomodate obsolete workarounds. Thanks, Steve.