20 Oct
2018
20 Oct
'18
8:30 p.m.
AMDG On 10/20/2018 02:00 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
<snip> The idea of being "incremental" is to allow those maintainers who would like to accept the additional responsibility to be able to do so, and to allow those who would rather not, to, well, not. This is not invalidated by our adding a line to their Jamfiles - once, without them needing to do anything about it.
That seems a bit worrisome to me, as I really don't like the idea of having a mixed-state sytem in the long term. It'll be really easy to end up with targets that use both the global /boost/headers and the library specific include paths. I can live with that as a temporary measure, but it's still ugly. In Christ, Steven Watanabe