Degski wrote:
The best thing would indeed be to stick to c++98 and be done with it... All this new stuff (what *are* they thinking?), it's a pita and you actually have to try and master it (and that takes effort), so bullocks...
Bah! Who needs these newfangled automated weaving looms anyway?
:)
On 4 December 2017 at 23:19, degski via Boost
On 4 December 2017 at 15:44, Boris Schäling via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org
wrote:
I would prefer upgrading though without breaking code - possible now thanks to Boost.Coroutine2).
The best thing would indeed be to stick to c++98 and be done with it... All this new stuff (what *are* they thinking?), it's a pita and you actually have to try and master it (and that takes effort), so bullocks...
degski -- "*Ihre sogenannte Religion wirkt bloß wie ein Opiat reizend, betäubend, Schmerzen aus Schwäche stillend.*" - Novalis 1798
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost