27 Nov
2020
27 Nov
'20
12:36 p.m.
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. November 2020 um 13:26 Uhr Von: "Niall Douglas via Boost"
On 27/11/2020 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:58 AM Antony Polukhin via Boost
wrote: asio 18 -> 3? beast 19 -> 4?
Beast depends on Asio, so you will have to convince Christopher Kohlhoff to go along with this idea for Asio.
If I were Chris K, I'd respond "If you want to use Boost.ASIO with the standard C++ library, please go use Standalone ASIO. Boost.ASIO is specifically ASIO targeting Boost".
Whats the problem? Shouldn't that essentially just be a matter of tweaking boostify.pl to replace fewer std types from the no-boost reference code with boost equivalents than it currently does? Or is there more to it? Best Michael