On 13 May 2015 at 15:20, Edward Diener wrote:
I don't know what this means. No one can be serious that Boost libraries must be designed with no dependencies on other Boost libraries.
I don't anybody at any stage has proposed this. This is a pure strawman by Edward.
What is a "pure strawman" mentioned by me ?
We were discussing a full fat, hard versioned dependency management system with external dependency injection facility. This achieves modular Boost. You claimed we were discussing removing all Boost dependencies from Boost libraries, and then made a stink about your claim which if true you would be right to do. Your claim is however complete make believe, and you are complaining about your interpretation of the proposal, not what is actually happening. I appreciate some actual documentation would be very useful. You may find the slides I'll presenting tomorrow of use: https://goo.gl/VHrXrj Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/