Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?

Daniel James wrote:

On 22 March 2017 at 03:00, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:

...

I'm more interested in our original topic, that is, there to be a way to validate a .qbk file such that (a) the warning for a missing [endsect] to be an error (and the same applies to other similar warnings, if there are any)

I'm working on it:

https://github.com/danieljames/quickbook/commit/68f11c3854b69173f321332f2cfa...

Thanks!