Re: [boost] [outcome] comments on Regular ops

On 23/01/2018 12:35, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

2018-01-22 23:31 GMT+01:00 Gavin Lambert:

...

There is still benefit in providing operator==(EC) even if T does not provide operator==, eg. for the construct: [...] This could be handled by providing a dedicated heterogeneous comparison between `result` and `EC`. But my preference would be a dedicated function.

That already exists; my point was that the argument to conditionally remove operator== might apply to operator==(outcome<>) or operator==(T) but is not necessarily applicable to other operator== cases.