19 Feb
2018
19 Feb
'18
7:58 p.m.
On 02/19/18 22:50, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Niall Douglas wrote:
As I've already said on boost-steering regarding this issue, I feel the code snippet in question falls under the fair use exemption.
I'm not a lawyer but...
Better to rewrite this from scratch in terms of boost::atomic_uint64_t IMO. The algorithm is straightforward.
+1 FWIW, there is already an implementation in Boost.Log which could be copied into Boost.Thread: https://github.com/boostorg/log/blob/develop/src/timestamp.cpp#L66