Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names

On 07/07/17 04:57, P F wrote:

...

On Jul 6, 2017, at 2:52 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:

On 07/06/17 04:10, Gavin Lambert via Boost wrote:

...

On 6/07/2017 10:00, Andrey Semashev wrote:

...

If we want to put binaries to the same directory, I think the name should include the architecture. At build time it's trivial enough to have your x86/64 libraries in one folder and your arm libraries in another; it might be convenient to have them in one place but I don't see this as compelling (but then I don't build arm binaries as a matter of course, so take that with a grain of salt).

The described use case is to be able to build everything in one go, so that all binaries end up in the common stage directory.

If you set the same install prefix for each build tree then you can build and install everything in one go:

ls -1 | xargs -n1 -I {} cmake --build {} --config Release --target install

Or you can create a CPackConfig.cmake file, which build the installer for you from each variant all in one go as well:

include("64/CPackConfig.cmake") set(CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS "32;Foo;ALL;/" "64;Foo;ALL;/" )

I was talking about building Boost using Boost.Build.