Re: [boost] [result_of] Allow result_of to work with C++11 lambdas

On 10/04/13 19:27, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

If you are right and after the patch result_of would provide the best we can do now, why the user would need to define any of these macros?

Using decltype directly could offer a compile-time performance boost. That's about it as far as I can tell.