Yes, I completely agree that a good project description is a must. But Jean-Claude is having some more ideas which can be implemented in this library and I am waiting for him so that we can make this library even better. And just in case if Google rejects the project, I would still like develop this library if someone is ready to mentor me outside the GSoC as this library will be really useful to astronomy community... On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 5:32 PM, David Bellot via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
yes indeed. I mean, a good project description is 1000 times more important that the aptitude test anyway. If Google doesn't give the money, then no project, so no need for aptitutde test :-D
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:39 AM, VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
2018-01-23 11:03 GMT-03:00 Pranam Lashkari
: As boost mentioned in policies and processes of this year to qualify for GSoC, students are supposed to take a C++ aptitude test.
So which aptitude test I am supposed to take...?
We'll check that later.
For now, worry about the project only.
-- VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira https://vinipsmaker.github.io/
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost