On 10/9/20 9:57 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
On 10/9/20 8:34 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost wrote:
In that case, I commit to doing a private mini-review of safe_numerics :)
Your feedback is always welcome. Your "conditions" pointed to all the stuff that need work. Without your work as review manager, I doubt that the library would ever have been completed.
Regards, &rzej;
Hmmm - thinking about this a little more and going over the text of the boost rules, (I'm a originalist and textualist), I would think that that the review manager could include in his list of conditions that that the library undergo a "mini-review" (whatever that might mean) before final acceptance. Soooo it looks like we've already got all cases covered: a library which is already almost perfect and just needs a few tweaks is just added in when the developer things he's done. At the other hand, some library which is more of a proof of concept, might be accepted subject to a condition which says it needs a "mini-review". No need what so ever to mess with boost rules. Robert Ramey
Regards, &rzej;
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost