Steven Watanabe wrote:
On 05/14/2015 05:49 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
It also points to the question 'should Boost move more-consciously toward a community maintenance model?', even if only for some libraries. It appears to be what is happening *anyway* without intervention.
It would be utterly pointless to intentionally try to move to such a model, when the CMT is understaffed to handle the libraries we already own. It's better to have a library owned by the CMT than by no-one, but it's definitely not ideal.
I didn't say it's ideal - I said it's happening *anyway* without intervention. If you want something 'ideal', then * awareness of what the current state actually is, and * awareness of what is happening anyway can only help. Your claim that what is happening *anyway* without intervention is 'not good' is a very important claim. Now that you know that something 'not good' is happening, do you think it's important to know that fact? Thanks, Steve.