10 May
2023
10 May
'23
3:42 p.m.
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 4:01 PM Matt Borland via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
[...] We use errno rather than std::error_code as specified in the standard.
Hi. Sounded like a good candidate for Boost.Compat (or Boost.Polyfill), discussed recently, until that sentence. I'm lucky enough to be able to use C++17 at work, but if I was on C++11, I'd tend to use such a library until I could use the std one, so deviations like this would complicate adoption because moving to std would then be harder. My $0.02. --DD