2015-09-17 13:35 GMT+02:00 Mikhail Strelnikov
I have an issue after switching from Boost.Coroutine to Boost.Coroutine2 - nested coroutine switches to its creator - not to the caller.
this is not how asymmetric coroutines are defined - a asymmetric coroutine has to return to its resumption point while suspended
Here is the code - http://codepad.org/WGNs0N7F
your code line 25 looks strange coroutine::pull_type default_coroutine = coroutine::pull_type(std::move( default_coroutine)); Is it a bug of Boost.Coroutine2? If not, how can I change this code to work
equally for Boost.Coroutine and Boost.Coroutine2?
instead of using coroutines I suggest to use class execution_context from boost.context (fucntions like symmetric coroutines)
P.S. What is the reason of boost::coroutines2::coroutine<void>::pull_type not having default constructor? It is still possible to have an "empty" pull_type, but it is painful process.
the constructor requires a function which will be executed in side the coroutine