5 Jul
2017
5 Jul
'17
10:02 p.m.
On 7/5/17 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Furthermore, my answer to the last question depends on whether this is an optional feature or a compulsory change. In case of the latter, I'm against the change.
Special-casing Boost.Python to not support this feature would be a hassle and a bit hostile to its users, relegating them to a second class, but it's doable.
Having a library that works differently for naming than all the rest seems like a non-starter to me. If the community decides the change is good then it should be for all libraries. michael -- Michael Caisse Ciere Consulting ciere.com