26 Dec
2015
26 Dec
'15
11:19 p.m.
On December 26, 2015 4:54:19 AM EST, Rainer Deyke
On 25.12.2015 13:03, Rob Stewart wrote:
I think, rather than X and Y providing conflicting definitions, the problem is that abc provides a specialization to allow interoperability with def, and def does the same for abc. Using the two libraries, in that case, always creates a conflict.
This implies a circular dependency between abc and def. If those libraries are that tightly coupled, surely they can work out this conflict between themselves?
It implies no such thing. It implies that each library provider chose, independently, to offer interoperability with the other using QVM. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)