2017-06-01 1:06 GMT+02:00 Gavin Lambert via Boost
On 31/05/2017 20:44, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:
2017-05-31 10:26 GMT+02:00 Gavin Lambert:
Anyway, the point is that this could actually transport multiple things; in particular as above both an error_code and an exception_ptr; perhaps set(error_code) could construct an exception as well, although I've explained elsewhere why I don't like that option.
In your mental model what is the interpretation of the situation when you have both an error_code and an exception_ptr?
Mostly where error() returns the error_code and exception() returns the system_error(error()), so that the caller could choose to treat it either way, as you'd expect.
Conceivably there could be cases where someone might want to have a different type of exception (eg. errc::invalid_argument plus std::out_of_range or a derived type, which might convey some additional information), although that could also be a can of worms best left unopened.
So, are you saying that exception() and error() observe the same "failure report", just in two different ways? Regards, &rzej;