On 27/08/2017 18:02, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Gary Furnish wrote:
I don't think anyone was proposing not to have develop on boostorg, I think they were proposing not having 5000 branches of new features actively under development on boost.
That's not a problem we're having at the moment. Our immediate blocker last time I took a look were the pull requests against boostorg/math. Math had many OS X jobs, which were taking quite a while.
Ugh, sorry. If that's the blocker I'll see if I can whittle them down: part of the issue is that the full Math tests take too long to run as one block, so they're actually split into 5 blocks. BTW, we already have a fine array of volunteer testers, is there any way of setting up our own private CI system - is the software used by Travis and Appveyor open source? Thanks, John. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com