On Apr 20, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Mathias Gaunard
On 18/04/14 10:00, Thijs van den Berg wrote:
Do not use reinterpret_cast in operator(). The behavior is undefined, and will certainly differ depending on endianness.
I did this for speed and I didn’t worry about endianness because it never crossed my mind. Changing the order of bits/bytes should not affect the quality of the randomness, but it’s indeed not nice to have different behaviour on different machines. I’ll fix this.
Personally I would want this engine to produce exactly the same results as the reference random123 implementation for a given seed.
This should be the case regardless of the platform used.
I totally agree, I want that too. Ive removed the reinterpret_cast, but it would be nice if we could very its behavior, eg on a platform that has different endianness.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost