23 Oct
2017
23 Oct
'17
1:30 a.m.
James E. King, III wrote:
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I'm not seeing any `long long` warnings though. clang is usually pretty picky about use of long long, and yet, nothing shows up in
In this build from 4 days ago on develop I did see it, as well as builds today:
https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/format/jobs/289630561 around line 940
That's some kind of a mystery then. https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/timer/jobs/291278694#L767 doesn't warn, https://travis-ci.org/boostorg/format/jobs/289630561#L975 does, and I see no relevant difference between the two.