Re: [boost] [outcome] Ternary logic -- need an example

Gavin Lambert wrote:

I don't know if it would be worthwhile to try to optimise storage for that case. [result]

An interesting point, because this is an argument in favor of returning by value from result<>::value() - I can synthesize an optional<T> on demand instead of storing one. (Return by reference mandates having an optional<> object stored.) Also applies to other possible combinations such as expected, E2>, outcome>, and so on that can all in principle be flattened into a single variant under the hood.