On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 10:25 AM Niall Douglas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 06/04/2022 17:48, Thomas Rodgers via Boost wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 4:41 PM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022, at 10:43 AM, Vinnie Falco via Boost
wrote: This came up before but it is worth mentioning again; in addition to a website update to make boost.org http://boost.org/ modern and
relevant, how do we feel
about a transition to forum-based discussion instead of the mailing list?
Strongly opposed.
Also strongly opposed. I am now the maintainer of Boost for Fedora/CentOS/RHEL (Jonathan is transition out of the role). If Boost discussion moves to some forum that I have to chase down vs. just arriving alongside the rest of my upstreams (e.g. libstdc++) it's likely to get missed, so the quality of Fedora's distribution of Boost will likely suffer.
As kind of proof of the problem, a lot of the discussion around this topic has been occurring on Slack on #boost, rather than here.
To sum up the discussion there, the more instant discussion happens on Slack, increasingly less immediate discussion is also happening on github discussions, and of course github issues.
In other words, discussion around Boost increasingly:
- Is centred per boostorg repo on github (library specific).
- Occurs on Slack (instant) or on github boostorg repo (less instant).
- Non-per-library discussion tends to happen increasingly on Reddit /r/cpp.
Which is to say, discussion is not happening here on this mailing list, or on other mailing lists.
So TBH Thomas the ship is sailing here already. The question is whether to actually do anything about it, or leave trends continue uninterrupted i.e. we're clearly already moving onto Github, Reddit, and Slack.
Well, my willingness to chase ships is limited...GitHub is the least bad alternative for my purposes, IMO.
Niall
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost