Hi
Yes that is what worried me, I can't have any operation like lock or
classic malloc in my thread.
I could use a specific allocator for preallocation,
But I would more need a queue like LockFree. and it would obviously be
asynchronous,
I know that the consequences (problem of message ordering, limis in
message rate because of the no allocation on the source side)
But that would realy be what I need.
Thank you for your answers
On 30 April 2013 05:41, Andrey Semashev
On Tuesday 30 April 2013 07:32:06 you wrote:
asynchronous_sink
uses a lock-free queue internally, so it will avoid locking. Ughh, I just remembered there is also a lock in this case, so technically it's not lock-free either. Sorry.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost