Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?

On 6/29/2013 10:04 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:

There are plenty of little endian only contexts that would want to avoid the host->network->host conversions for all transfers.

..and that's one reason why support for little endian is now planned (https://github.com/dplong/bstream/wiki/To-do). I'd like to localize the endianess behavior so that a consumer could even define an otherwise unsupported endianess via, for example, overloading a single function. Paul