On 5/21/16 4:09 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
Wow. Boost community is so harsh, unfair and narrow. I must say I'm amazed with your persistence in communicating with it - it sounds like it's a pure waste of your time.
The boost community open about considering ideas. It's just that not all ideas are recognized as good ones. Just the fact that some idea doesn't convince a consensus, doesn't mean that Boost is harsh, parochial, close minded, old, or whatever. It likely means that that ... the not many people consider it a good idea. This is the simplest explanation and I'm sure the correct one. What would boost look like if we accepted every idea proposed? OK too ridiculous. What would boost look like if half the ideas proposed were accepted? Still too ridiculous. Is there any idea you think should be accepted? Do you really believe that replacing the current review system with some automatic scoring system would be an improvement? Then go ahead and make your case. But don't accuse those who have made a better case of having some sort of personal failures. I know you don't mean to do this, but that's what your doing. Robert Ramey