25 Sep
2017
25 Sep
'17
1:32 p.m.
On 25 September 2017 at 14:20, Jonathan Wakely via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 25 September 2017 at 14:08, Edward Diener via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I have already submitted PRs for these files, and iostreams and
parameters
should be currently fixed in 'develop'.
Since this was not isolated to a single library, I assume this is quite easily done by mistake with common workflows. Perhaps we ought to consider having an automated test for .hpp (and other) files not being executable somewhere as a quality gate before subsequent releases? Neil