Petr Machata wrote:
Hi there,
do you think it would make sense to move static_warning.hpp from boost/serialization up directly under boost/, and perhaps move it conceptually under Boost.StaticAssert umbrella? It seems strange how a serialization library exposes such general-purpose service. We could still provide a forwarding header in Serialization namespace for backward compatibility. Shall I prepare a patch to that effect?
lol - it used to be in there. Do to strident objections from some key member's of the boost community I had to move it be a detail of the serialization library. They same could be said for serialization::singleton, serialization::state_saver, and a few others.
Thanks, PM
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost