5 Jul
2017
5 Jul
'17
10:08 p.m.
On 05.07.2017 18:02, Michael Caisse via Boost wrote:
On 7/5/17 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
Furthermore, my answer to the last question depends on whether this is an optional feature or a compulsory change. In case of the latter, I'm against the change. Special-casing Boost.Python to not support this feature would be a hassle and a bit hostile to its users, relegating them to a second class, but it's doable. Having a library that works differently for naming than all the rest seems like a non-starter to me.
If the community decides the change is good then it should be for all libraries.
Agreed, Stefan
michael
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...