On 2018-12-17 4:16 p.m., Rene Rivera via Boost wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM stefan via Boost
wrote: But they are no substitute for a wiki, for many different reasons.
Excuse my ignorance.. How so? Which reasons?
* wiki contribution doesn't require the same level of authorization as write-access to a repo. * wiki contribution doesn't require any git expertise. * wiki contribution is much quicker both on the client as well as the server side (it doesn't require any tools other than a web browser, and neither a rebuild on the server). These may sound like quantitative differences, but overall I think they make a qualitative difference (what people like to call a "game changer"). Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...