21 May
2014
21 May
'14
3:57 p.m.
On 05/21/2014 08:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
I have also argued that re-implementing all that functionality from scratch is foolish with so many existing implementations, so any boost.xml project should focus on wrapping such implementations, rather than reinventing them. In fact, I believe such an API should be robust enough to be able to wrap different backends, rather than depending on a particular implementation choice.
I personally like the idea of having a small, fast, lightweight XML parser with no external dependencies under the Boost Software License. Eric