Re: [boost] Interest in non-intrusive signal/slot lib?

On May 11, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

Hello,

I realize that Boost has Signals library already, but I've implemented a non-intrusive one which approaches the problem differently, and I'm pretty sure that there is no overlap between the two. It turned out more generic than I originally anticipated, so I thought I'd ask if others would find it useful as well.

Specifically I was motivated by wanting to use Qt without MOCing. I asked the Qt community if that was possible which generated several rather annoyed negative responses.

Have you looked at CopperSpice? It's basically Qt 4.8 but in C++11 and without MOC. It's also probably the reason for the negative responses on the list, but who knows.