El 12/03/2024 a las 22:28, Robert Ramey via Boost escribió:
Enough of the web site exists so that it's clear what it would be like. The authors of this work deserve a yes or no answer as to whether it's going to be accepted or not. That is the purpose of the Boost Review. It's an onerous process. Many library authors have declined to submit themselves to it. It is a lot of work. But I think on balance the Boost review process is the secret of Boosts success. For something as central to Boost as this web site, the review process should be applied.
I'm asking the Board of Directors to impose this requirement if its not already clear that it's necessary.
I've mentioned several times: an imposition is not desirable, it won't work and it would be a failure as a community. We (developers, maintainers, review managers) should take the responsibility, or this project has no sense because there is no Boost community. I volunteered for the review management but if we have more talented volunteers they're welcome. Mathew, can we have a tentative schedule? I think we don't have anything in the pipeline, we could start pretty soon if desired... Best, Ion