17 Apr
2019
17 Apr
'19
2:06 p.m.
Am 17.04.2019 um 15:43 schrieb degski:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 13:38, Jan Herrmann via Boost
mailto:boost@lists.boost.org> wrote: ... unit tests are a good thing do document the internal interface. They show which assertions the author made.
Yes, let's replace documentation by unit-tests ... documentation is over-rated, no matter what ...
I didn't meant (and wrote) this. My intention is to have additional unit test. They should be written in C++ which means they can be more formal than documentation. They can provide an ADDITIONAL perspective.
degski -- /*/*Microsoft, please kill Paint3D*/*//**/