18 Sep
2015
18 Sep
'15
1:45 p.m.
thy, you figured out a bug - a function call was missing (a bug fix will follow this evening).
I'm sorry for being so annoying, but by "missing" you mean you'll fix Boost.Coroutine and will leave Boost.Coroutine2 as it is now? I do understand that Lua is not a reference language, but its behaviour matches Boost.Coroutine's behaviour - https://ideone.com/3RWPKF and prints 122. Again, I'm not saying this - http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/docs/MCC15-04.pdf should be trusted but it says that: "Lua coroutine facilities implement our concept of full asymmetric coroutines [Moura et al. 2004]" May be you can add a parameter for user to choose which behaviour they want? Thanks.