Hello Alexander, While I do appreciate the feedback very much, I think three times is more than enough :) Greetings, Orson Peters On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Александр Зайцев via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hello. Try to send my thoughts from another email.
1. Are there any specific concerns you have about pdqsort vs. std::sort? 2. Does it compile for you when you try to use it as a replacement for std::sort? 3. How does the performance compare on your system vs. std::sort? 4. Do you think we should include pdqsort in Boost.Sort? 5. Do you have any concerns about switching the default/fallback sort in Boost libraries (including Boost.Sort) from std::sort to pdqsort?
1. Only that pdqsort is really better than std::sort's Introsort 2. Yes, it does. 3. Pdqsort is much faster than std::sort. 4. Yes, i do. I think that pdqsort is really good sort algorithm - it's really fast and pdqsort is already implemented sort algorithm in Rust's libcore as sort_unstable. 5. No, i have not.
Best regards, Alexander Zaitsev zamazan4ik@gmail.com
2017-06-28 16:42 GMT+03:00 Robert via Boost
: On 6/27/2017 6:37 PM, Orson Peters via Boost wrote:
I don't believe it's just me that can't view your post Alexander, as the post is empty on the Boost archives as well: https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2017/06/236626.php
It is not only you. All I have is empty content on this thread from Alexander.
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Alexander Zaitsev via Boost <
boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman /listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/ mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost