Indeed, looking at the page, at lot of projects are like "finish this or finish
that". I don't think it's the right way to attract students. Maybe things
could be improved or, if not possible, we can archive those proposals at
the end of the page and only put the focus on subject with enough matter.
Can the description of the benchmark library be improved. I think that one
is a good candidate.
Mario, could you move it closer to the top as well, alongside the other
projects having a complete description.
Best,
David
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Boris Schaeling
Can those who planned to add a proposal but didn't do yet update https://svn.boost.org/trac/**boost/wiki/SoC2013https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/SoC2013as soon as possible? And can those who added a proposal check it one last time?
Andrew reminded me that Boost wasn't accepted last year because we had a superficial list of ideas without realistic goals and expectations. We should be able to increase our chances if we document actual requirements and possibly design approaches. According to Google they look extensively at every org's ideas page. So this is really important.
Thanks, Boris
______________________________**_________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/** mailman/listinfo.cgi/boosthttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost