Re: [boost] [shared_array] Why not in C++11 ?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Glen Fernandes wrote:

Sid Sacek wrote:

You mentioned in an earlier mail that you would prefer that size() return a value like -1 in such a case. That also feels very strange to me; i.e. returning a size_t but reserving a value like -1 to indicate unknown size.

+1, I hate magic values.