27 Nov
2020
27 Nov
'20
12:26 p.m.
On 27/11/2020 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:58 AM Antony Polukhin via Boost
wrote: asio 18 -> 3? beast 19 -> 4?
Beast depends on Asio, so you will have to convince Christopher Kohlhoff to go along with this idea for Asio.
It is one of those rare occasions that I agree with Vinnie. If I were Chris K, I'd respond "If you want to use Boost.ASIO with the standard C++ library, please go use Standalone ASIO. Boost.ASIO is specifically ASIO targeting Boost". I have that exact opinion regarding Outcome, incidentally, though I made it a bit easier to bash Boost.Outcome with a stick into 100% not using Boost than Chris K has with ASIO (which BTW is also possible, in theory). Niall