Re: [boost] [outcome v2] Please comment on new result<T, EC> reference API docs

Niall Douglas wrote:

Dear Boost,

I've been hard at work refactoring Outcome to match the peer review a few weeks ago. Much comment at the time mentioned the poor experience of the reference API docs, so can I get a community check of this:

https://dedi4.nedprod.com/static/result-v2/doc_result.html

Ideally, one would want only result<> documented, with all its public members, without the implementation detail result_base<>. Not sure if this is possible with standardese at the moment.