data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64472/64472de4b341c6d294297c03a7699b1fabffeec1" alt=""
16 Jan
2014
16 Jan
'14
12:26 p.m.
> On 15/01/2014 23:29, Hartmut Kaiser wrote: > > Fine. So you vote YES and I vote NO. What's the problem? > It depends on whether the vote is just selfish, or reflects that: > - the presence of an additional not-quite-what-you-need doesn't > negatively impact you > - it is valuable for others and technically reasonable > > I would hope that votes are not entirely selfish. > > Under the circumstances I would think you could abstain but unless there > is some reason for its presence to cause a problem, why would you Nack? With all due respect, I'm contributing to Boost for over 10 years now, and I have 4 major libraries in Boost I'm authoring/contributing too. I have managed numerous Boost reviews in the past. I'm a member of the Boost steering committee, and I'm one of the main organizers of BoostCon and C++Now. I have invested more time into Boost than you can even start to imagine. Nobody has so far managed to allege I could be selfish with regards to Boost. I'm very much inclined to ask you rethink what you wrote. Regards Hartmut --------------- http://boost-spirit.com http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu