Em Seg, 2014-03-03 às 08:20 +0100, Damien Buhl escreveu:
Hi Vinícius,
Hi Damien, thanks for the feedback. And you write emails like MarkDown(?).
Perhaps it's not bad to look at what Artyom Beilis does with cppcms : [http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/main ](http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/main)
I'm familiarized with cppcms. The author wrote nice benchmark projects/texts[1][2] that inspired me to try to achieve the same some day.
And others things like [https://github.com/metagoto/fcgixx](https://github.com/metagoto/fcgixx).
I just did a fast incautious read through the project now that you mentioned. It looks like it won't serve as inspiration to a generic project like I want, but more like an implementation thing. I'll check it appropriately and maybe comment more later anyway.
And considering http, it could perhaps be valuable to look at SPDY / HTTP 2.0, because even if it will be as compatible as possible with HTTP 1.1 I believe that features like server push transactions should be taken into account in your library API. As you spoke about websockets you should have thought to something similar.
Yes, there was an interesting talk about HTTP/2.0 on linux.conf.au[3] that I watched (thanks to the provided online records) several weeks ago and I'll of course take that in account in my proposal.
You spoke about embedded, having facilities or an API which abstracts protocols like CoAP translation from/to HTTP would also be nice in my opinion.
I've never read about CoAP. Thanks for bringing this up. I'll check it out. [1] http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/benchmarks_php [2] http://cppcms.com/wikipp/en/page/benchmarks_all [3] http://mirror.linux.org.au/linux.conf.au/2014/Wednesday/51-HTTP2.0_And_You_-... -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker