śr., 30 wrz 2020 o 17:39 Vinnie Falco via Boost
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:30 AM Peter Dimov
wrote: I don't. If you don't like basic_parser, don't use it. It's not clear to me what anyone would gain from preventing others from using it.
If Boost.JSON is accepted and we are targeting December ship date, I am weakly in favor of making basic_parser private for one release so we can work out more details. We might need to tune the API to achieve the space savings we want.
I support this decision. Good interfaces are an important part of boost, so it may be better to wait with exposing it. Also, you can call it an implementation detail but nonetheless put it in a header accessible by the users. The eager ones can still use it, even if it is not part of the official interface. Regards, &rzej;
Thanks
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost