9 Jul
2013
9 Jul
'13
4:45 a.m.
2013/7/9 Andrew Ho
The boost::move library binds to std::move/T&&/etc. when the compiler supports such features, and only uses work-around mechanisms when the compiler lacks such support.
Should we add similar support for boost::function?
I don't think so. boost::function doesn't have exactly the same interface as std::function, unlike the case of 'move', which has consistent interface.