Re: [boost] Ternary logic programming (was: Re: [variant] Maintainer)

2015-07-02 23:37 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas :

Does this make sense?

Yes, thanks for summarizing. I'm starting to like this abstraction. I'll let you know if I get any doubts about its design. Now you just need to address Vicente's concern about the monad name. Maybe rename result to light_result and monad to result. -- Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira https://about.me/vinipsmaker