On 2/15/24 18:03, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:01 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost
wrote: On 2/15/24 07:33, René Ferdinand Rivera Morell wrote:
Warning, I could be wrong in anything below as I have faulty memory. :-)
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 7:14 PM Andrey Semashev via Boost
wrote: But the important part is that the full control over the website should be in the Boost Foundation hands, not someone else's.
I agree that control of the web site should not be bound to any one organization. And hence I agree that the Boost Foundation should not own the web site.
I can agree to this, if Boost Foundation has an open enough license for the website implementation, such as BSL,
I think you meant C++ Alliance in that. As that's who owns the new implementation.
I meant Boost Foundation, the entity that receives the license on the website implementation from The C++ Alliance. But yeah, you could say that The C++ Alliance needs to offer an open enough license.