Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?

I believe people would care less if a library is standard or not if there was an easy way to get the library and integrate it in a project. Most Python and Ruby users have no reluctance into trying a library because it's so easy to plug one in by copy/paste or by using pip or gem. Having a standard library that only provide essential necessities would be tolerable in such a context. The other issue with standardising a library is that it seem insanely hard to update it later for fixes.